Thanks LW001 for your answer. It would be nice even with a manual detection they were required timestamped it and what song etc etc. so you know what you are dealing with and know where to look.. I get content ID claims 20 min video`s and you get these idiots claiming a 5 sec portion of the video what is just a dance beat! at least with the time stamp u can listen to that portion and counter claim. With a manual it could be any section of the video.
I took a look at the video`s and Yes that song was in the other video`s as well <<< that was cause of the ID claims.
Matter of fact, they will never be required to provide more because the copyright system isn't designed to give creators a good time. The thing's pretty much only designed to cover YouTube's ass legally.
contenido derecho autor usaste una musica que no era tulla que te pusiero alguien esta reclamando su musica o sonido que tiene y esta monetizado el reclamante esta reclamando lo que es suyo siempre pon los requisitos de la musica creador asi no te pondra id o derechos autor espero que te sirva un saludo
Also touching on this point, crediting the music is not a 100% solution either. Fun fact: When appealing a CID claim YouTube asks you why you believe you have rights to use set piece of content. When selecting "I've credited the owner" you get sent to a page explaining that that doesn't work.
That said I want to end this on a point I often make. Only use music you have explicit permission to use. Email the creator asking for rights for it, look through their policies and if in question don't use it.
